Caught the last few minutes of Gorillas in the Mist last night, after the Olympics, where once again, the announcers were disapointed in one thing or another. Everyone's a critic. Like I've said previously, if you as a talking head, weren't a player, you've got no right to critique others. Anyway, Gorillas in the Mist was about Dian Fossey who gave her life to try to save Gorillas in Africa from poachers. All they wanted was the gorilla hands. Serioursly? Killing tigers for bones and skins. Killing rhinos and elephants for the horns and tusks. Maybe someone can start a rumor about the sexual power of squirrel tail. We have plenty of them to kill.
The Japanese have indicated that they will reject the UN ban on fishing for Bluefin Tuna, regardless of the studies showing that they are an endagered species. In New Jersey, we're doing a black bear hunt to cull the amount. After all, they're infringing on our territory. I've supported the Humane Society, so I'm against cruelty to any animal. But once again, I ask the question about double standards. Why is it ok to kill off the predators just for doing what they are supposed to do? Yet, kitty and puppy mills are ok, adding more pets into the system? We can't use horses that are past their prime for meat in the US.
On Bill Maher's season debut this week on HBO, they discussed the catastrophe in Haiti. As much as we should be proud of the outreach and the money raised to try to rebuild Haiti, he brought up the situation in the Congo. Several hundred thousand died, and millions were displaced in Haiti. In the Congo, millions were killed and tens of millions were displaced, and thousands still die every day. Too far away to make a difference? Or is it because it's man-made, not nature?