Labels (one of many)
If someone donates money to help others, he or she is called a philanthropist. If someone uses policy to help others or to level the playing field, he or she is called a bleeding heart liberal. Who gives more, liberals or conservatives? And are "selfish motivations" subject to scrutiny or should we just take donations at face value? As I am writing this, my doorbell has rund and ironically, it is a group of people going door to door on behalf of "Awake". It talks about saving the environment, helping developing nations, and family values, etc, but obviously there is a religious overtone. Does the end justify the means?
One of the newest labels is the Grassroots Activist. I believe the definition entails a person who supports local initiatives. It could be as simple as discussing with Alex at A&P a transition from the vending machines from the entrance, as the space could be used for better purposes (reducing landfill, avoiding HFCS) to something more aggressive, such as lobbying for organic only food in the schools. Maybe it could include campaigning on behalf of a candidate who doesn't have a ton of money, or creating a fund to sponsor a lesser know set of charitable organizations. Colleges have started a competition called recyclemania. With the amount of kids in sports leagues in the area, I'm sure there a number of programs that can be initiated for the betterment of the community.
