Truth, Nonsense, Divisiveness, and Hooey
I refused to watch the "debate" that took place at the chuch in California last weekend. The location and content seemed in opposition to the concept of separation of church and state. Like everyone else, I heard the scorecard afterward, and the straight talk express apparently did very well, especially on the pro-life stance. So once again, I raise the question - Do leaders actually care about some of the stuff they throw? Abortion, gun control, same-sex marriage - as long as the issue remains out there, division occurs and single-issue voters can be swayed. The Bush administration is proposing changes that could withhold government money by essentially lumping contraception as a form of abortion. In the off-chance anyone wasn't aware, Presidential nominee Senator McCain was divorced previously. Circumstances occurred obviously - his POW time and her car accident, and obviously it took place before the Internet, but still. According to the church, marriage is above all circumstances, just as the right to life, even to the point of conception. And what about same-sex marriage? Is this somehow worse than infidelity? According to Freakonomics, serious crime rates dropped dramatically about 17 years after Roe V Wade (and more people are hurt in swimming pool accidents than by guns). With roughly a gazillion people in the world, and a lack of infrastructure to accommodate them, do we really want to add unwanted children to the mix? Theoretically, if seas rise a few feet, and hundreds of millions of people are displaced from their coastal homes, will anyone really give a hoot about this conversation?
For the record, I have no issue with divorce, abortion or same-sex unions. I am not pro-divorce nor pro-abortion, and it's unfortunate that it happens or that there is a need. However, there is. More importantly, I question why would the evangelicals approve of someone who admittedly destroyed his own marriage? How can anything of significance get done when so much time is spent on these types of divisive issues? Again, does it really matter, or is it simply a further example of dividing and doing anything it takes to win?
